We live in a world steeped in religion. Out of the almost 7 billion people on our planet more than four billion are embedded in one of the world's three main religions. Most of our holidays have a religions significance. We elect or dismiss our politicians on religious grounds. We print religion on our currency and into our laws. We swear on bibles and the zealots among us all claim to have GOD on their side. There is no escaping the fact that our future is deeply intertwined with religion.

Most religious behavior is based on a tribal mentality. They all postulate that god has a chosen people and if god has a chosen people then it is clear that anyone who is not part of the chosen people is part of the un-chosen people. That is how the tribal mentality is created and re-enforced.

Bishop John Shelby Spong brings reason to the circular arguments of tribal religion. He introduces us to a new way of looking at Christ and walking in Christ that is fitting of a modern, global and responsible society. He offers us a sound alternative to fundamentalism while still recognizing our need as conscious beings to ponder the meaning of life as we live with the ever present fear of death.

Give him a listen and watch his words brighten your day.

Pathways Launch

Adult Forum 1-9-2011

 

A Conversation in Grebenstein, Germany

 


The Ascension of Jesus

The Burke Lecture

The future of Christianity

Jesus for the Non Religious by John Shelby Spong
Listen to an interview with Bishop Spong
(runs: 54:02)


Listen to the Interview
with John Shelby Spong

 

 Shelby SpongSearching for an Authentic Christianity
 

 RealAudio help here.

 

   
   

The Great Resurrection Debate

 

The Bible, re-examined
Minnesota Public Radio Interview

 

An Authoritative Voice for Believers in Exile

For those seeking to experience Christianity in a new and vibrant way, Bishop John Shelby Spong offers fresh spiritual ideas. Over the past four decades, he has become one of the definitive voices for progressive Christianity. As a member of Bishop Spong's online community, you'll receive insightful weekly essays, access to Message Boards that will connect you with other believers in exile, and answers to your questions from Bishop Spong himself!

 

 

 


God in the 21st Century

 

Reclaiming the bible.
 


 


Challenging one's own faith

 

An excerpt from Bishop Spong's Weekly Column
 

”Think Different - Accept Uncertainty”
A Call to Re-Image God ...

Defining the human experience that we call God is not just a modern activity, human beings have engaged in this task since the dawn of civilization. The factor driving the change in the human definition of God was never a new revelation from on high; it was always a dramatic shift in human life usually brought about by a necessary adaptation in the eternal quest for survival. The God experience has always been given a human definition.

The first recognizable human religion, anthropologists tell us, was what we today call “Animism.” Animism was a religion that perceived of God not as a being fixed in one particular place, but as a diffused and ever present invisible force found everywhere. Animism pointed to the presence of spirits connected with various parts of nature. In this animated world, there was a spirit of the ocean that kept the tides within its bounds. If that spirit became violently angry a tsunami might result. There was the spirit of the olive tree that when pleased caused the tree to maximize its fruit. The presence of “spirits” explained the life and behavior of everything: animals, plants, the sun and the moon. At this time in history, human beings were in the hunter-gatherer phase of our development, unsettled nomads engaged in the endless human quest for food. Food, generally speaking, could not be stored or at least not for long periods of time, so starvation was an ever present threat to survival. It was the religious task in this animistic world to keep the spirits happy so that those spirits would aid us in the struggle to survive. That was the primary human understanding of God for literally thousands of years.

When the shift from nomadic wandering to a settled life of cultivating the soil began to occur the human understanding of God had to begin to shift and shift it did. The first two places where settled human communities developed were in the Nile River valley of Egypt and in the area known as Mesopotamia, located between the Tigris and the Euphrates Rivers. In both places, the rich and fertile soil invited people to cease their wandering life and to settle where that soil promised them a steady supply of food.  No, the shift did not happen all at once, but when it did happen, the understanding of God developed in a nomadic culture no longer made sense in their settled state. Animism now began to fade and a religion organized around fertility cults came into being. This religion, dedicated to a God conceived of as the “Earth Goddess,” began to dominate the human experience. Ancestor worship was part of that shift. The reason for this addition to human thinking was that a nomadic people were always on the move and so their dead, even if buried, were always left behind and thus soon forgotten. Graves did not become shrines. When settled communities were formed, the dead were buried nearby and the idea of being surrounded by one’s ancestors seemed natural. Indeed, the act of burial itself was a gift of Earth Mother worship, since burial in the ground was thought of as an act of opening the womb of Mother Earth and placing her own children back into that womb.

Child sacrifice also grew out of these fertility cults. The idea here was that if one offered one’s first born child to the fertility goddess, one would be blessed by that deity with many more children. Religion was then, as it has always been, in the service of human survival and survival had now moved from the daily searching for food in a spirit-filled world into the attempt to grow food in an agricultural community, where bountiful yields depended on the good will and favor of the fertile Earth Mother.

In time, however, those agricultural communities became bigger and more complex and thus they had to be both governed and defended. This new reality demanded a new tribal organization. The survival of these agricultural communities began to depend on both the military wisdom and brute strength of the male warriors, the strongest of whom would become the chief. With survival now dependent on both the fertility of the Earth goddess and the power of the male chief, slowly the deity began to be portrayed as a feminine goddess with a male consort.  Over time the male warrior deity grew stronger until God came to be thought of primarily after the analogy of the chief. God came to be thought of as the heavenly chief, a single ruler who guarded the community from above. This was the first expression of a primitive monotheism. There was an intermediate step between animism and monotheism that was reflected in the gods and goddesses of the Olympus.  Here there was a male chief, a Zeus or Jupiter, together with a female partner, a Hera or Juno, but with various other natural phenomena covered in animistic style by special deities: There was Mercury the messenger god, Neptune the god of the sea, and Cupid the god of love. It was the male-warrior deity, thought of after the analogy of the trial chief, however, who was destined to be the wave of the future, the context in which the theistic nature of God would emerge....

... If we do not pass it on, it dies. Love cannot be saved or stored. If God is love, we need to ask the obvious question: Can we then say that “Love is God?”   Does defining God as love not carry us beyond theism?

A second biblical image for God is that of a rock. Well over a hundred times in the Bible, the word “rock” is used in reference to God. That idea has entered Christian hymnody in such titles as “Rock of Ages.” To what reality was this biblical image referring? Experience tells us that when we stand upon a rock, we are supported and kept from sinking. Is that the connection? My great theological teacher, Paul Tillich, made that connection when he referred to God as “The Ground of Being.”  Can this “rock” image also lead us beyond theism?  Is our “being” an aspect of something we might call “being itself”? Are we connected in some mysterious mystical way with all that is? Can we look at God through this lens and break the theistic pattern by exploring these possibilities? I believe we can. I think we must. The future of Christianity requires the discovery of new analogies for speaking of the holy. That is the first step in moving beyond theism. It is a slow process, but a necessary one.  Once we enter it, however, new doors begin to open. We will continue to walk through those doors as this series continues.

~John Shelby Spong

 

Sign Up Now for Bishop Spong's
weekly column.
 


Tapestry Interview October 2001

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

home